Rusyalı Lolota Device

breaks the TV literary

seen earlier that the video had to break his almost filial relationship with the TV in order to become a free and independent art is real But this separation? Is it justified? Is there any substantive argument to support this separation?

For Flusser function was to serve video to television as a tool for storing and documenting information, an object that allows you to record TV programs to then be edited and censored, that is why the video used for television. In the words of Flusser "The purpose of the video is to serve the television. To that end precisely what subjects produced their decision ... ... It is therefore an instrument that serves the purposes of the television system, which, in turn, is an element of the cultural system and determines that conditions us "(" The Video gesture "by Flusser, page 190)

Now, contradictory to Flusser, I argue against a word, speed. Television and video if there are two separate things and then show one of many by which the video and television and indpendizan distencian.

Television product of their need to sell more, and also by the echo of that TV time is literally gold, had to take a form of work where the speed of the images and the changes are the main thing, so we see the news, a veritable flurry of news that does not even give us time to process them. Furthermore, in the talk we witness interviewed was bombarded with questions and more questions without giving them the skills to take the time to reflect or expose it their point of view, if you dare commit such a sin, will be assaulted with more questions and will be viewed as uninformed.

For its part, the video, without this need to deliver and produce, found a way to "restore life to their own pace" (Television and Video Art: Thinking against the clock to Margarita Schultz, Cord Magazine loose page 4) developing its own line of work that article they call "default." Thanks to this, the video art can be giving back to the viewer the ability to concentrate, to shelve the leading paced life with the constant bombardment of images of everyday life, again returns you the ability to reflect, to contemplate and become co-author of a work.

Basically, differences between TV and the video is therefore what Nestor says in his foreword Olhagaray Llanos about how the video should oppose the "incestuous relationship that he handed the television institution . Divorce necessary to define and develop his power today to talk as equals with television. "(From the video-art net-art Olhagaray Nestor Llanos, page 9) it is completely based on speed and time.